0.96.0 release notes
23rd November 2019
🌟 New features
The type signature of clients and services has been greatly simplified. Note that this involves various breaking changes unfortunately. See the 'Breaking changes' section for the details. #2239 #2254
// Before: public class FooHttpService implements Service<HttpRequest, HttpResponse> { ... } public class FooRpcService implements Service<RpcRequest, RpcResponse> { ... } public class FooHttpClient implements Client<HttpRequest, HttpResponse> { ... } public class FooRpcClient implements Client<RpcRequest, RpcResponse> { ... } Service<HttpRequest, HttpResponse> foo(Service<HttpRequest, HttpResponse> bar) { ... } Function<Service<HttpRequest, HttpResponse>, ? extends Service<HttpRequest, HttpResponse>> httpServiceDecorator; Function<Service<RpcRequest, RpcResponse>, ? extends Service<RpcRequest, RpcResponse>> rpcServiceDecorator; Function<Client<HttpRequest, HttpResponse>, ? extends Client<HttpRequest, HttpResponse>> httpClientDecorator; Function<Client<RpcRequest, RpcResponse>, ? extends Client<RpcRequest, RpcResponse>> rpcClientDecorator; // After: public class FooHttpService implements HttpService { ... } public class FooRpcService implements RpcService { ... } public class FooHttpClient implements HttpClient { ... } public class FooRpcClient implements RpcClient { ... } HttpService foo(HttpService bar) { ... } Function<? super HttpService, ? extends HttpService> httpServiceDecorator; Function<? super RpcService, ? extends RpcService> rpcServiceDecorator; Function<? super HttpClient, ? extends HttpClient> httpClientDecorator; Function<? super RpcClient, ? extends RpcClient> rpcClientDecorator;You can now specify service-level settings for annotated services, just like other service types. #2180 #2222
Server server = Server.builder() .annotatedService().pathPrefix("/api") .requestTimeoutMillis(5000) .exceptionHandler((ctx, req, cause) -> ...) .build(new Object() { ... })) .build();RequestContextnow has its ownRequestId, which is a 64-bit random integer by default. #2001 #2174 #2203 #2224Server server = Server.builder() .service("/", (ctx, req) -> { return HttpResponse.of("Request ID: %s", ctx.id().text()); }) .build();You can now add a cause to an
HttpStatusException. #2253HttpService service = (ctx, req) -> { try (FileInputStream in = new FileInputStream(...)) { ... } catch (FileNotFoundException e) { throw HttpStatusException.of(HttpStatus.NOT_FOUND, e); } };Armeria server now always has a fallback service which is matched when no routes match a request. #1625 #2255
- As a result, a route decorator bound at
prefix:/can intercept any requests, even the requests not handled by any services:// CorsService will intercept any requests, // even the ones not handled by any services. Server server = Server.builder() .service("/foo", fooService) .service("/bar", barService) .routeDecorator().pathPrefix("/") .build(CorsService.newDecorator(...)) .build();
- As a result, a route decorator bound at
You can now determine the log level of
LoggingClientandLoggingServicedynamically. #2250 #2258LoggingClient.builder() .requestLogLevel(log -> ...) .responseLogLevel(log -> { if (log.responseCause() == null || log.responseCause() instanceof HarmlessException) { return LogLevel.INFO; } else { return LogLevel.WARN; } });ClientFactoryOptionshas been added to allow programmatic access to theClientFactorysettings. #2230ClientFactory factory = ...; boolean pipelining = factory.options().useHttp1Pipelining();You can now disable Armeria's Netty-based asynchronous DNS resolver by specifying
-Dcom.linecorp.armeria.useJdkDnsResolver=trueJVM option. Use it only when the default resolver does not work. #2261
💪 Improvements
- Armeria client does not block a request anymore when DNS resolution takes long time. #2017 #2217 #2231
- You do not have to prepend
none+prefix to non-RPC URIs anymore. #2219 #2241// Before: Clients.of("none+https://...", ...); // After: Clients.of("https://...", ...);- The behavior of
Scheme.parse()andtryParse()has been improved in the same manner:// Scheme.parse() now uses SerializationFormat.NONE automatically: assert Scheme.parse("http") == Scheme.parse("none+http");
- The behavior of
🛠️ Bug fixes
- Armeria Spring auto-configuration now works correctly even when only
GrpcServiceRegistrationBeans are given. #2234 RequestContextis not pushed more often than necessary anymore when notifyingRequestLogListeners. #2227DynamicEndpointGroupnow handles the case where an endpoint address does not change but only a weight. #2240HttpStatusExceptionnow respectsFlags.verboseExceptionSampler(). #2253AccessLogWriterdoes not fail with aClassCastExceptionanymore. #2259- Fixed a bug where a service receives an
OPTIONSrequest even if the service did not opt-in forOPTIONSmethod. #2263
🏚️ Deprecations
ClientFactory.DEFAULThas been deprecated in favor ofClientFactory.ofDefault().- The getters for host-level settings in
ServerConfighave been deprecated. #2244 #2246// Before: HttpService service = (ctx, req) -> { return HttpResponse.of("maxRequestLength: %d", ctx.server().maxRequestLength()); }; // After: HttpService service = (ctx, req) -> { return HttpResponse.of("maxRequestLength: %d", ctx.virtualHost().maxRequestLength()); }; - Continuing the migration to static
builder()factory methods, the following classes have switched from constructors to staticbuilder()methods: #2221ClientCacheControlClientConnectionTimingsClientDecorationClientFactoryClientOptionsClientRequestContextEndpointInfoFieldInfoHttpClientLoggingClientLoggingServiceRequestContextCurrentTraceContextRetrofitMeterIdPrefixFunctionServerCacheControlServiceRequestContext
☢️ Breaking changes
The signatures of
RequestContext.newDerivedContext()have been changed so they always requireRequestId,HttpRequestandRpcRequestfor less ambiguity. #2209 #2224Scheme.parse()andtryParse()do not fail anymore even if the scheme does not start withnone+: #2219 #2241// Scheme.parse() now uses SerializationFormat.NONE automatically: assert Scheme.parse("http") == Scheme.parse("none+http");ClientBuilderParams.uri()does not return a URI withnone+prefix anymore. #2219 #2241HttpClientinterface has been renamed toWebClient.HttpClientis now a different interface that extendsClient<HttpRequest, HttpResponse>. #2254// Doesn't work: HttpClient client = HttpClient.of("https://www.google.com/"); // Good: WebClient client = WebClient.of("https://www.google.com/");Services must implement
HttpServiceorRpcServiceand clients must implementHttpClientorRpcClient: #2239 #2254// Before: public class FooHttpService implements Service<HttpRequest, HttpResponse> { ... } public class FooRpcService implements Service<RpcRequest, RpcResponse> { ... } public class FooHttpClient implements Client<HttpRequest, HttpResponse> { ... } public class FooRpcClient implements Client<RpcRequest, RpcResponse> { ... } // After: public class FooHttpService implements HttpService { ... } public class FooRpcService implements RpcService { ... } public class FooHttpClient implements HttpClient { ... } public class FooRpcClient implements RpcClient { ... }You'll have to change any
Service<...>andClient<...>usages in your code intoHttpService,RpcService,HttpClientorRpcClient, unless you intended to express both HTTP- and RPC- level types.// Before: Service<HttpRequest, HttpResponse> foo(Service<HttpRequest, HttpResponse> bar) { ... } // After: HttpService foo(HttpService bar) { ... }Similarly, you must use
SimpleDecoratingHttpClientorSimpleDecoratingRpcClientinstead ofSimpleDecoratingClient, andSimpleDecoratingHttpServiceorSimpleDecoratingRpcServiceinstead ofSimpleDecoratingService.// Does not work: class MyDecoratorService extends SimpleDecoratingService<HttpRequest, HttpResponse> { MyDecoratorService(Service<HttpRequest, HttpResponse> delegate) { super(delegate); } ... } // Good: class MyDecoratorService extends SimpleDecoratingHttpService { // Note the constructor parameter change. MyDecoratorService(HttpService delegate) { super(delegate); } ... }If you implemented your decorator without extending the
SimpleDecorating{Http,Rpc}ServiceorSimpleDecorating{Http,Rpc}Client, then you must make sure that it implementsHttpService,RpcRequest,HttpClientorRpcClient.// Does not work: class MyDecoratorService implements Service<HttpRequest, HttpResponse> { final Service<HttpRequest, HttpResponse> delegate; MyDecoratorService(Service<HttpRequest, HttpResponse> delegate) { this.delegate = delegate; } ... } // Good: class MyDecoratorService implements HttpService { // Note the type change. final HttpService delegate; // Note the constructor parameter change. MyDecoratorService(HttpService delegate) { this.delegate = delegate; } ... }
Service.decorate()has been pushed down toHttpServiceandRpcService: #2239 #2254// Does not work: Service<HttpRequest, HttpResponse> service = (ctx, req) -> ...; service.decorate(myDecorator); // No such method // Good: HttpService service (ctx, req) -> ...; service.decorate(myDecorator); // OK!The type parameters of decorator
Functions have been changed. #2239 #2254// Before: Function<Service<HttpRequest, HttpResponse>, ? extends Service<HttpRequest, HttpResponse>> httpServiceDecorator; Function<Service<RpcRequest, RpcResponse>, ? extends Service<RpcRequest, RpcResponse>> rpcServiceDecorator; Function<Client<HttpRequest, HttpResponse>, ? extends Client<HttpRequest, HttpResponse>> httpClientDecorator; Function<Client<RpcRequest, RpcResponse>, ? extends Client<RpcRequest, RpcResponse>> rpcClientDecorator; // After: Function<? super HttpService, ? extends HttpService> httpServiceDecorator; Function<? super RpcService, ? extends RpcService> rpcServiceDecorator; Function<? super HttpClient, ? extends HttpClient> httpClientDecorator; Function<? super RpcClient, ? extends RpcClient> rpcClientDecorator;Some types, which could be used at both HTTP- and RPC- level, have been split into two different types. For example:
DecoratingClientFunctionhas been split intoDecoratingHttpClientFunctionandDecoratingRpcClientFunction.DecoratingServiceFunctionhas been split intoDecoratingHttpServiceFunctionandDecoratingRpcServiceFunction.LoggingClienthas been split intoLoggingClientandLoggingRpcClient.ServiceWithRouteshas been split intoHttpServiceWithRoutesandRpcServiceWithRoutes.TransientServicehas been split intoTransientHttpServiceandTransientRpcService.
The following services are now provided only at HTTP-level. Please let us know if you need an RPC-level version of them.
LoggingServiceMetricCollectingServiceStructuredLoggingServiceKafkaStructuredLoggingService
⛓ Dependencies
- Brave 5.8.0 -> 5.9.0
- gRPC 1.24.1 -> 1.25.0
- Jackson 2.10.0 -> 2.10.1
- Micrometer 1.3.0 -> 1.3.1
- Netty TCNative BoringSSL 2.0.26 -> 2.0.27
- Protobuf 3.9.1 -> 3.10.0
- RxJava 2.2.13 -> 2.2.14
- SLF4J 1.7.28 -> 1.7.29
- Spring Boot 2.1.9 -> 2.1.10